Thursday, 25 April 2013

Phil Daintree's shameless lies - Part 6

This page is written in response to the lies that +Phil Daintree  has written about me, and spread on the internet. Despite years of searching he has been unable to find anything I have written that is untrue, and he has had to resort to vague generalities, faked emails, and badly fabricated screenshots (you can see the joins if you zoom in using any bit mapped image editor). +Phil Daintree is welcome to make any comments to these pages, as he has done in the past. If I agree with what he says I will amend my writings, if I do not agree I have allowed his comments to stand next to mine so that people can make their own judgements. I have every confidence in the intelligence of readers to make a sensible judgement based on the facts. +Phil Daintree will not allow me the right of reply to any of the lies he has told about me. It seems to me significant that he realises that if people see both sides of the argument they will see through his lies.

Well it seems our hopes for a resolution to this were premature. No sooner have the lawyers of one hosting company forced Phil Daintree to remove his lies about me, he moves to another. The lawyers of that hosting company force him out and he moves to another. With the help of those lawyers we are seeking a world wide blacklisting for him to stop him owning any domains, and remove any he currently owns from his control.

Funny that he will never discuss these points. He has the chance on here - I have publicly committed to non interference with his comments, and will happily submit to third party checking of that claim. He doesn't allow me the right to comment on his page though. I am sure readers will form their own opinions about why he is so scared to resolve these issues by discussion.

Most of his page consists of a post I have allegedly made. I have searched via Bing, Google, and Yahoo, and have failed to find this post anywhere, except on pages posted by Phil Daintree. Funny this.... I am sure readers will form their own opinions about why he is so afraid to resolve these issues by normal discussion.

Lastly on the subject in my previous post on the subject of copyright. Phil Daintree for some reason thinks that it is important that under his instructions when I had just joined the project that I had put the copyright notice on to webERP. I then took legal advice discovered it was wrong and after consultation with Phil Daintree I removed the earlier bug I had done. Can someone tell me why this supports his case to own the copyright of my work?

The bible tells us:
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

Phil would do well to remember this teaching

1 comment:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.